The Corporate Cost of ICE Worksite Enforcement


Over the past year, South Florida businesses reported an increase in Immigration and Custom Enforcement (ICE) worksite enforcement activities, such as Form I-9 inspections. Noncompliant employers risk civil and criminal penalties of thousands of dollars per occurrence, depending on the nature of the offense. This year, ICE levied its largest penalty in history for noncompliance with the hiring requirements--$95 million.

During the hiring process, employers are required to complete Form I-9 for each person they seek to employ to ensure that the applicant is eligible to accept employment in the U.S. The prospective employee and the employer must complete and sign designated sections of the Form I-9, and the employee must provide proof of identity and eligibility to accept employment. The employer is required to retain the I-9 for a designated period. Despite complying with these requirements, the employer can face substantial financial costs related to an ICE inspection.

Administrative Costs

During an inspection, federal agents require the employer to produce not only original Form I-9s, but payroll records, tax records, and other employee records within three (3) days. As the documents requested can span more than a year and include records of former employees, the document production can be voluminous for a company with many employees that are paid weekly, especially for companies in industries which experience high turnover rates, such as construction, agriculture, lawn service, food service and hospitality industries. Generally, the Form I-9 information must be provided electronically in alphabetical order. In addition to gathering the documents, a corporate employee must review and organize the documents as directed by the ICE agents. All of this compliance work takes away from time administrative or managerial staff could otherwise spend on productive business activities.

Costs Associated with Employee Replacement and Workforce Shortages

It is during this document gathering and review process that the employer usually discovers that some of the I-9s are incomplete, expired or incorrect. Special Agents from ICE will work with a forensic auditor to review the Form I-9s for technical and substantive deficiencies. Technical deficiencies can include incomplete or improperly completed documents. The employer is given a deadline to correct the technical defects in the Form I-9s. In most cases, the technical violations are corrected without much imposition on the employer. Conversely, substantive violations present a significantly greater cost for the employer. Substantive deficiencies often relate to the eligibility of the employee to work for the company. Many times, the government informs the employer that the employment or identification documents are invalid. At that time, the employer must either reverify the employee’s eligibility to work or fire the employee immediately. Thus, despite following the legal requirements for hiring the employee, the employer must bear the expenses of abruptly terminating the employee and filling the position.

For an employer who has complied with the law but is found to be employing ineligible workers, immediately terminating multiple staff members can be devas tingly expensive. Studies report that each time an employer replaces a salaried employee, it costs, on average, six to nine months of the employee’s salary in recruitment and training costs.[1] On the least expensive end of the spectrum, a low-wage, low-skill employee can cost a company 16% of the employee’s annual salary to replace him or her. The cost to the company increases as the skill and salary of the employee to be replaced increases. On the high end, it can cost more than twice the employee’s salary for a top-level employee making more than $100,000 annually.

Beyond the expense of recruiting and training a new employee, the business can suffer other negative financial effects of abruptly terminating one or more employees. Workforce shortages can hamper the company’s ability to meet service or production demands, limit its ability to accept new business, cost the company accounts due to inadequate performance, and more. The stigma that the company has hiring compliance violations might cause other potential employees to shy away from open positions. Moreover, in South Florida, the potential employee pool becomes significantly smaller for several months each year, making new employees scarce.

Civil and Criminal Fines and Penalties

Employers are required to terminate ineligible employees immediately. Failure to do so exposes the employer to civil and criminal penalties. Fines for noncompliance are levied in accordance with a schedule and enhancement matrix that weighs factors such as number of ineligible employees and number of violations. Fines can be as little as $375 for a single occurrence to tens of millions of dollars. Further, the government can pursue criminal charges in appropriate cases. Thus, an employer faces serious penalties if it retains the unauthorized worker, even temporarily.

In light of the costs and risks, employers should take steps to protect their companies. Annual audits of Form I-9s can help an employer identify and correct technical errors. An immigration attorney can help employers identify documents that are potentially invalid. Employers should be mindful of expiration dates of identification and employment authorization documents, and require employees to renew these documents timely. Employers who are comfortable with a direct government interface into their hiring practices might consider using the Electronic Verification system (E-Verify). Regardless of how an employer chooses to ensure compliance, the employer should take steps to avoid the devastating corporate costs of losing employees due to noncompliance.

[1]MerHar, Christina,Employee Retention - The Real Cost of Losing an Employee,, February 4, 2016.

Related Posts
  • Attorney Gaston Featured in WPTV Segment Read More
  • Immigration Reform: A Summary of the Proposed Legislation and Policies Read More
  • Biden’s Proposed Revisions to U.S. Immigration Policy Read More